ORIGIN OF THE WOODRUFF NAME
Woodreeve.
In the Saxon period in England, a “reeve” represented the lord of a
district, whether township or hundred, at the folkmote (meeting or
assembly) of the county. Within his district he levied his lord’s dues,
and performed some of his judicial functions. A “wood-reeve” was
presumably reeve for his lord’s woodlands. Sometimes written: Woodrove,
Woodroffe, Woodroufe, Woderofe, Woodrofe, Woodrufe, Woodruffe, Woodruff,
Woodrow, Woodrop, Woodreefe.
King Henry
VII was at the end of his reign. The year was 1508. THOMAS
WOODROVE’s name first appeared in the records of the Kentish town of
Fordwich, the entry having been to note payment to the church wardens of
the rent of his house, due to the church for the preceding year.
Indicated by a deed of 1538 (Fordwich Muniments Chest, 9th, Henry VIII),
he became a considerable property holder. Thomas Woderoff’s ownership
included 2 messuages*, with 3 gardens, 30 acres of arable land, 5 acres
of meadow, and 8 acres of wood, in Fordwich.
* A messuage is a “premise”, or a place to live. Example:
there are no trees on the premises. |
The Abbot of St. Augustine’s Monastery, outside the walls of Canterbury,
was Lord of the Manor of Fordwich, and claimed many rights within the
Liberty (Borough) which were at variance with what the Mayor and
Commonalty considered to be their chartered privileges. One obnoxious
claim to which they had to submit was that the Abbot’s bailiff must be
present whenever the Mayor held court. In 1510, it was to summon a
non-resident bailiff from his home that our ancestor was despatched with
all speed to the neighboring Isle of Thanet. A few years after he rode
on a longer, more hazardous, journey, with a therefore needed companion,
to Westminster, so that, as trusted envoy of the town, he might pay a
fine incurred by his fellow townsmen into the King’s exchequer. Because
in later days such duties were almost invariably entrusted to the town
clerk, while there was then no office with that title, he was probably
acting in that capacity.
If so, it
would have been in the line of promotion that he was a Jurat* in 1538,
when, during Henry VIII’s suppression of the greater monasteries, St.
Augustine’s estates were given over to the rapacity of the King and his
courtiers.
* The only existing Jurats are “judges and legislators
appointed for life” (Century Dictionary). In Fordwich, the
Jurat seems to have been Magistrate and Municipal Councillor
in one. |
In the
following year, Thomas Woodrove sat with his fellow magistrates at
Fordwich to arrange for the conveyancing to the favored courtiers of a
portion of the possessions of those against whom the Liberty had so long
struggled for its privileges.
ABOUT FORDWICH, KENT, ENGLAND
Fordwich, Kent, England, a quaint little town situated on
the right bank of the river Stour, once far-famed for its
delicious sea-trout, two or three miles below the city of
Canterbury, of which, in the long ago, it was the port. For
now an inland village, in Saxon days it was at the head of a
tidal estuary; so the early Kentish kings made it a customs
station, whose commercial importance declined as silt made
the river less navigable.
It was the “little burgh which is called Forewic,” when the
Domesday survey was made in the year 1085. Later it became a
member of the Cinque Ports’ confederacy. Some time between
the years 1218 and 1292 it obtained full corporate
privileges (a list of its annually elected mayors, beginning
with the latter year, has, with much labor, been compiled
from the existing records); but for centuries its burgesses
had to struggle for their rights against the encroachments
of their ecclesiastical and other overlords. As the times
changed, and Fordwich became a mere hamlet, the governing
body gradually outlived its usefulness. Finally, by the
Municipal Reforms Act of 1883, it ceased to be “at once the
smallest and one of the oldest of the Kentish
municipalities.” |
No other
“Woodruff” was recorded until the Town Books mentioned his son William
in 1550. Shortly after this the name of Thomas disappeared from the
records. He died about 1552.
WILLIAM WOODROFFE “The Elder” died
in 1587, when Elizabeth was Queen. During his lifetime, Fordwich, now
freed from the restrictions imposed by the Abbot of St. Augustine’s, was
encouraged to rebuild its Court Hall, and the unpretentious little
building of timber and plaster, on the banks of the Stour, remained
until at least 1909, the publication date of the Woodruff genealogy.
William took
an active part in municipal affairs, and became a Jurat. From his
generally signing the minutes of the Court, he apparently presided,
perhaps as senior Jurat, in the frequent absences of the Mayor. He was
also a “Key Keeper of the Town Chest,” a very honorable office conferred
upon “the two best men of the Liberty.” The “chest” was for the safe
custody of deeds and other important records, fees being charged for the
service. There is little further mention of him in the annals other than
the entry in the Fordwich muster roll of 1573 that “Willyam Wodruf
thelder wt his men Robert Woodrufe and Edward Parker wt his furniture”
is credited with “one calyver furnyshed one almon rivett furnyshed.”
The caliver was a handgun that was fired from the shoulder,
the heavier musket of that day requiring a rest;
“alman-rivetts,” a sort of light, flexible armor, of German
origin. |
His other
son, William Jr., was also on the roll.
CHILDREN OF
WILLIAM WOODROFFE “The Elder”
-
William Woodroffe, Jun. This line became extinct, when William’s
grandson, Thomas, died without issue.
-
ROBERT WOODROFFE; married Alice
Russell.
ROBERT
WOODROFFE,
from whose day our descent can be verified by the parish register as
well as by the town records, figured, as did his brother William, in the
Town Books as a freeman (entitled to the privileges of the Borough). He
is also on record as a Jurat and a Churchwarden in 1584.
As far back,
then, as 1508, our Woodruff ancestors were freemen of Fordwich and men
of standing in the community. Apparently they were Kentish yeomen* of
Saxon blood, to judge from the surname.
* A “yeoman”, in recent English use, is one owning (and
usually himself cultivating) a small landed property; a
free-holder. |
In 1572,
he married ALICE RUSSELL,
of the parish of St. Mary Northgate. The parishes of Fordwich, St. Mary
Northgate, and Sturry are contiguous.
Robert
Woodroffe died in 1611, when James I reigned.
CHILDREN OF
ROBERT AND ALICE (RUSSELL) WOODROFFE
-
JOHN WOODROFFE I,
born in 1574. He married Elizabeth
Cartwright.
-
William Woodroffe.
JOHN
WOODROFFE - Generation 4
JOHN
WOODROFFE I was
born in 1574, at Fordwich. As an adult, he lived in Northgate, where his
uncle, William Russell, was a churchwarden.
He
married in 1601, ELIZABETH
CARTWRIGHT. Their son John II was baptized in 1604.
At the
relatively young age of 37, John Woodroffe I, “delivered this [sic]
of September, 1611,” when he was “very sick in bodye.” His will was
proved in October of 1611.
He, “John
Woodruffe, husbandman” (head of a household), requested that he be
buried at the direction of his “well-beloved wyffe”. He made minor
legacies to his young and only son John II, and to others; and left all
the rest of his “goods and chattills” to his wife, Elizabeth.
The times
were so stormy that women and children must have protection, and in the
same month her husband died, Elizabeth Cartwright Woodruffe married, on
24 October 1611, John “Gosmore”. Both were of the parish of St.
Mary, Northgate. The marriage appears in the registry of St. Mary’s
Bredin, in Canterbury, Kent, England. He thus became the stepfather of
our ancestor.
WHO WAS JOHN GOSMER?
Mr. John
Gosmer’s name was first seen in Fordwich, Kent, England, as a signature
– John Gozmur – as witness to the will written in September 1611 of John
Woodruffe, of the parish of St. Marie’s of Northgate (adjoining
Fordwich) in which Woodruffe had named his wife Elizabeth and young son
John, our immigrant ancestor.
In 1613
he was a “sidesman,” the churchwarden’s assistant. As such, he signed –
after the vicar and churchwardens – a bill of “Christenings, Marriages,
and Burials in the Parish of St. Mary, Northgate.”
In 1618,
a John Gosmer, bachelor, joiner, of St. Mary Northgate, married Ann
Woodruff, widow (Canterbury Marriage Licenses). What are we here to
think? Was the emigrant John Gosmer a widower himself, when he married
the widow Elizabeth Cartwright Woodruff? Was he the father – by a first
wife – of the John Gosmer of 1618 who married widow Ann Woodruff, and as
has been suggested, of the Anne who married our ancestor John Woodruff
II b. 1604? Savage’s Genealogical
Dictionary, has something to say about this, as do notes 12 and 21
in The Woodruffs of New
Jersey.
In 1637
it is recorded that there was a dispute between the Fordwich Corporation
and Mr. Gosmer, as a tenant of the Chapter of Canterbury, regarding the
extent of their respective rights over some land, which was referred to
arbitration. The result is not known to us but in 1638 Mr. Gosmer was
himself the Mayor of the Corporation, i.e., the Mayor of Fordwich.
All
England was then in the throes of the impending civil war, and, like
other ports, Fordwich resisted King Charles’ illegal exaction of
ship-money. In 1639 the Council in Whitehall demanded from Mr. Gosmer’s
mayoral successor the unpaid assessment for 1638, “which should long
since have been paid to the Sheriff of Kent or the Treasurer of the
Navy.”
It is
very likely that our Mr. Gosmer was fed up, cut his losses, and ran.
He and
Elizabeth had immigrated to America sometime between 1638 and 1640.
Efforts made at Sandwich (a port just seaward of Fordwich) and Dover in
England, and in the United States, have failed to find any record of his
emigration. The item may possibly be buried in the unexamined
manuscripts of the Public Record Office of England. But Hotten’s
Introduction (in his List
of Emigrants, 1600-1700) says in effect that only the names of those
emigrants were taken who legally left
the shores of England. Those who went (as Mr. Gosmer obviously did) to
avoid payment of the hated ship-money left secretly; and that of such,
no record would exist.
All that
said, the Woodruff genealogist has never found another John Gosmer in
America at that time. Howell adds his authority that there can be no
reasonable doubt, it was the ex-Mayor of Fordwich who is next on record
at Lynn, Massachusetts, where already on 10 March 1639, the founding of
Southampton, Long Island, had been formally “undertaken”.
By the
mutilated declaration of the Company we know that on or about June 4,
1640, “Mr. John Gosmere was admited an undertaker”. At Southampton, on
December 16, 1640, the name of “Mr. John Gosmer” headed the list of the
purchasers on the “Indian Deed” for the land lying eastward “between the
foresaid bounds by water” from the place “where the Indians hayle their
cannoes out of the North Bay to the southside of the Island,” later
known as Canoe Place.
On 7
March 1644, it was ordered that “yf by the providence of God there shall
be henceforth within the bounds of this plantacon any whale or whales
cast up,” certain designated townsmen should attend to their “cutting
out.”
In this;
in dealing with the Shinnecocks, Montauks and other tribes; in dividing
the lands among the townsmen; in fencing out the wilderness; in clearing
off the forests; and in all the varied tasks of a new settlement, the
town records show that “John Gosmer, Gentleman,” took a leading part.
For the enforcement of law and order, generally three magistrates were
elected by the General Court (town meeting), “who were looked upon with
a degree of veneration that the modern occupants of the office can
hardly hope to obtain”. It was in 1647 when Southampton entered into a
compact with Connecticut. Gosmer and one other were the first to
represent the town in the House of Magistrates in the General Court at
Hartford.
Then, in
the midst of his prosperity, a lifelong grief came to him in the death
of his only son, Richard, whose estate he administered in the year 1650.
Richard
had been appointed to the whaling squadron along with his father in
March of 1644. He was presumably born in England due to his being an
adult at this time. And he also presumably had a house of his own, as he
had been appointed from the 3rd Ward, while his father was appointed
from the 2nd Ward.
Notwithstanding this, Howell says that he appears to have died
unmarried; and without children. The Gosmer name dropped out of the
records after John Gosmer’s death.
In 1652
Mr. Gosmer was the Primus of
the three Southampton magistrates; and he was re-elected several years
in succession. During 1655-58, he again represented his town at
Hartford. When, in 1657, there was an Indian alarm, and “for
preservation of ye towne” it was voted that all men should “lay downe
themselves in respect of their persons & estates, to bee disposed of by
the said 7 men in a way of righteousness, to attend any means that may
in their Judgement effect the said ends,” he was one of the seven.
Already,
however, he had begun to set his house in order. In 1655 he bought
property in Boston. In 1658 he made it over “to his kinswoman, Ann,
widow of Richard Carter.”
Why to Ann, widow of Richard Carter?
Why did John Gosmer Sr. leave a bequest in his will to Ann,
widow of Richard Carter? It could be explained in the
following theory:
John Gosmer Sr. was a widower, himself, when he married the
widow, Elizabeth Cartwright Woodruff. By his first wife, he
had a son, John Gosmer, Jr., who, as a bachelor in 1618,
married as her second husband, a widow named Ann Woodruff.
When John Jr. died, Ann would have become a widow for a
second time. As such, she remarried for a third time,
Richard Carter; and yet again became widowed.
As Ann, widow of Richard Carter, but having earlier been a
daughter-in-law, or “kinswoman”, to John Gosmer Sr., it
would have been natural for Mr. Gosmer to have provided
something out of his wealth for this widow of his first-born
son.
And also, it would have been natural for him, when made
childless by the 1650 death of his second son, Richard, to
choose the name of his first-born, John, and give that name
to his adopted son. See Savage’s Genealogical
Dictionary. |
In 1657 his stepson, John Woodruff, succeeded him in the whaling
squadron. It is probably in the same year that this John Woodruff, Sr.,
received from him the “messuage or tenement over against the said Mr.
Gosmer his home lot, which said tenement he bought of John Topping” in
1657, and “five acres of land”, though the deed was not recorded until
20 February 1660/61.
And then
on 29 July 1659, he deeded to his “adopted sonne, who hath lived with me
from a child, all my goods and chattells, house and lands”; to which
Elizabeth his wife consented. No other will has been found. After this
deed, he was lost from the town records, this man who was called “The
Honorable”; who was considered one of the seven leading men of Western
Long Island.
John Gosmer
died in 1661. A masterful man of affairs, upright, able, energetic,
wealthy, dignified, and perhaps just a little bit dictatorial. In his Puritan
Settlers, Hinman has written: “an examination of the Colony records
of Connecticut shows that Hon. John Gosmer, ...[and others] were the
leading men in the eastern half of Long Island in its early settlement.”
Doubtless, John Gosmer lies with his fellow pioneers in the old South
End burying ground at Southampton; but their tombstones have crumbled
into dust.
CHILD OF
JOHN I AND ELIZABETH (CARTWRIGHT) WOODROFFE
-
JOHN WOODRUFFE I, baptized in 1604. John married Anne.
JOHN WOODRUFFE II -
The Immigrant -Generation 5
JOHN WOODRUFFE II,
was baptized in 1604, the only son of John Woodruffe I of St. Mary
Northgate (1574-1611). By the remarriage of his mother, Elizabeth, he
became the stepson of Mr. John Gosmer, of Fordwich, where John grew to
manhood.
At the
age of 32, John Woodruffe II served as churchwarden in Fordwich parish.
Only one adult “John Woodruff” could be found throughout the three
parishes – Fordwich, St. Mary Northgate, and Sturry – between the years
1625-1640, and that was the one baptized at St. Mary Northgate in 1604,
and who was churchwarden at Fordwich in 1632. He was, beyond reasonable
doubt, the “son John Woodruffe” named in the will of his father, John I,
of Northgate (b. 1574).
MARRIAGE
John
Woodruffe married ANNE (-). She may have been the daughter of
John Gosmer by a former wife.*
* In 1665,
their son John III spoke of Mr. Gosmer as his “grandfather.”
He could have been a grandson by blood, but it also could be
that he was a step-grandson and looked to the elder man as
his grandfather. In early records, the terms “in-law” or
“step-” with father, brother, son, etc., were often omitted
as people referred to their spouses’ relatives as father or
mother, brother or sister. |
John
II and Anne had four children – two sons and two daughters – all
step-grandchildren of John Gosmer. Both of their sons bore the name
John, so they both were, technically, John III. The younger, our
ancestor, was called John Jr. or “the Younger Brother”. More on this
shortly.
EMIGRATION TO AMERICA
John
and Anne Woodruff, and their son John III accompanied the Gosmers on
their journey to Lynn, Massachusetts, and Southampton, Long Island, in
1639-40.* They were among the settlers who arrived at Southampton, Long
Island, during the first twelve months of 1640-41. Southampton Town
Records show one adult John Woodruff of the period as a member of the
Gosmer household.
Who Led the
Way?
* The Gosmer
household may have travelled to America with Richard and Ann
Carter, who were first on record at Boston on 2 July 1639.
It’s possible that Ann Carter was formerly a daughter-in-law
of John Gosmer; in his will she was named a “kinswoman”.
More about her later. Otherwise, the Gosmers followed the
Carters. |
CHALLENGES IN THE NEW LAND
For
years after the founding of Southampton, although the land was honorably
purchased of its original owners, yet the settlers never saw a moment’s
rest for fear of their dreaded neighbors. In the field a guard was kept;
at night none knew at what hour the alarm would sound; to meeting, on
the Lord’s day, they went as men prepared for instant war. Every male,
from 16 to 60, was enrolled in the ranks. Under such circumstances it
might be expected Ann and John would live with the Gosmers, both no
longer young. That belief is confirmed by Mr. Gosmer’s statement (in the
deed that was his will): that the Woodruff’s younger son, John, born in
Southampton, whom he adopted, “hath lived with me from a child.”*
Why Two Sons
Named John?
The giving
of the name John to a younger brother while an elder brother
John still lived in the same household, was very unusual. It
is supposed that Mr. Gosmer, upon the 1650 death of his only
son, Richard, named this youngest step-grandson when he
adopted him and made him his heir. The boy was not included
in the 1657 list of arms-bearing men, evidence that he was
then not 16 years old. As well, by matching many other dates
of persons named in wills, the legal transfer of an earmark,
etc., it has been determined that the youngest boy was born
about 1650. |
In
those patriarchal days, as a member of Mr. Gosmer’s household, John
Woodruffe II would not have been considered a “head of family,” and,
therefore, would not appear in the List of May, 1649. And he did not. He
did not appear, in fact, in the town records until he was 53 years old,
named on April 30th, 1657, among the arms-bearing men to whom gunpowder
was served out because of an Indian attack on the town.
LAND
On
September 17, 1657, Mr. Gosmer “bought an hundred pound lot” from John
Topping, with “the housing and fences and all his accommodations,” in
Southampton. This he handed over to his stepson; possibly to qualify him
as his successor in the whaling squadron, which he became the same year.
Some town offices and privileges depended on ownership of property. That
lot is on the west side of Main Street, nearly opposite and SW of the
Gosmer home lot.
In
1657 also, but probably later than September, John Woodruffe II is on
the list of the representatives of the town houses, while Mr. Gosmer’s
name is not. And he is recorded in the Plan of Main Street, in
Southampton, as having, in 1659, succeeded Mr. Gosmer in his homestead.
In
1659, also, he is for the first time mentioned as exchanging land. On
February 20, 1660/61, the gift (1657) of house and land to him was
registered by Mr. Gosmer, after which the name of Gosmer disappeared
from the records.
Apparently, therefore, John Gosmer, who had retired from active work in
1657, died in 1661; and John Woodruff II, then 57 years of age, became
head-of-household in his stead.
In
1661 and 1662 he was only recorded as a successful plaintiff; as on an
important jury; as “giving in his ear-mark”; and as dealing in land.
In
1663, at the town meeting of May 1st, when new rules were established
regarding the keeping up of fences to prevent the trespassing of
“cattell, sheepe, goats and hoggs” that had been breeding quarrels and
lawsuits, he was elected and “sworne impounder.”
THE TIMES THEY ARE A
CHANGIN’
Southampton in
the ‘60s
In 1664 the
times suddenly changed. Southampton, at its foundation, was
a little republic in itself, and soon entered “into
combinacon with the Jurisdiction of Connecticote.” The
relation continued practically unchanged until on 12 March
1664, when King Charles II granted Long Island (and other
territories) to his brother, James, Duke of York; and,
against the wish of its people, Suffolk county, with its
chief town Southampton, became a part of the Province of New
York.
In the
following year, under the “Duke’s Laws,” promulgated at the
Hempstead convention in March, 1665, Suffolk county was made
the “East Riding (court district) of Yorkshire.” The
American “Yorkshire” was made up of Queen’s County; King’s
County, Staten Island, and Newtown; and Suffolk County, all
in what is now New York.
Townsmen and
General Courts (or town meetings) ceased to exist, and a new
tribunal was established called the “Court of the Constable
and Overseers.” All the complaints were met in the manner
that might be expected from those who considered that they
were commissioned by Heaven to rule and that the people were
born to obey.
Gov. Nichols
was succeeded by Gov. Lovelace, whose character as a ruler
may be learned from his remark, that the only way to keep
the people quiet was to lay such taxes upon them as should
leave no time for thinking of anything else than how to pay
them. |
Many good men went into
opposition against all this, and perhaps John Woodruff was among them.
But, except such mention in land matters as would be expected for a
large proprietor, he does not appear in the records until the final
entry of 22 February 1669, when he joined in signing a petition to “our
honorable Governor Gen’l. Lovelace” that they might not be deprived
of “those our
privilidges which at great rate wee have procured with much
dificulty and danger wee have soe many years possesssed.”
|
Possibly, also, his absence from public life was, at least in part, due
to his having grown older than his years. He was “weak in Body” when he
made his will on May 4th, 1670. He died on May 9th, and his will was
proved on July 1st . He was 66 years of age. The inventory of his estate
was valued at £122.7.8.
John
Woodruffe’s Will
He gave to his
“Eldest son John Woodruff of Elizabeth Town, one half crowne
piece of money in full of all portions and Patrimony
whatsoever, to be expected from mee, or out of any part of
my estate”. To his daughters, Anne and Elizabeth, each £20,
to be paid after his widow’s death.
These small
legacies usually indicated that the heirs concerned had
already received their portions, on their marriage or their
going out into the world. But the peculiar and particular
wording in regards to the eldest son (John III) may indicate
long-standing family friction due to “the younger brother”
having been adopted as son, and made heir, by John Gosmer.
John II
further made the “wife Anne Woodruff and my youngest son
John Woodruff joynt Executors”. And he left “all the rest of
my Estate both land and chattels and goods and household
stuffe to be to ye only proper behoofe and benefitt of my
said Execs.”
By the
Inventory attached to the will we further know that there
had already been “one half of ye Land Howsings and
Accommodations clearly by Deed of Gift disposed of to his
son John”; obviously the younger son. No one has ever found
that deed. |
CHILDREN OF JOHN & ANN (-)
WOODRUFFE II
1.
John Woodruffe III, was baptized in 1637 at Sturry, Kent,
England, within a half-mile of Fordwich.
He came to
America in 1639-1640 with his parents and grandparents on
the journey from Fordwich. He does not appear in the Long
Island records until 30 April 1657, when at twenty he was
included in a list of arms-bearing men.
He was first
mentioned as a landowner on 20 February 1659/60. About the
same time, he married Sarah Ogden, a daughter of Mr. John
Ogden, of Southampton. Ogden added to his land, and in 1664,
gave him a “house and home lot” on Main Street which he had
bought from a relative who was leaving Southampton.
As mentioned
above, in 1664, King Charles’ granting Long Island (and
other territories) to his brother James, Duke of York and
Albany, caused bitter discontent among the inhabitants,
including, certainly, our Woodruffes. To make matters worse
for John, now that his father was dead, his younger brother
would have possession of the homestead that ordinarily
should be his as head of the family. And possibly lastly,
his daughter Sarah died, probably in 1664. So it seems he
made the choice to join his father-in-law, Mr. Ogden, in the
emigrating to New Jersey.
Between August
29th and September 7th of 1665, he recorded sales of his
house to Robert Woolley, his brother-in-law, and of his land
to other fellow townsmen. He arrived in Elizabeth Town, New
Jersey, before, or at least by, February 1666.
He and Sarah
had other children, as follows: sons John, Jonathan,
Benjamin, Joseph Sr., David, and Daniel; and daughters
Elizabeth, Sarah, and Hannah.
After the
death of his wife, he remarried Mary Parkhurst. And on 27
April 1691, in Elizabethtown, New Jersey, when only
fifty-four years old – but “in hazard of life” – he made his
will, and on May 25th it was proved.
He was a
founder of Elizabethtown, New Jersey. Descendants of this
John III have been called the Elizabethtown Woodruffs.
2.
Anne Woodruffe; mar. Robert Woolley.
3.
Elizabeth Woodruffe; mar. Robert Dayton.
4.
JOHN WOODRUFFE III, called “The Younger Brother”, was born about
1650 at Southampton, Long Island; the heir and adopted son of his
step-grandfather, John Gosmer. He married Hannah Newton.
JOHN WOODRUFFE III
“The Younger Brother” -
Generation 6
John Woodruffe
III, “The
Younger Brother”, was born in Southampton, about 1650.
On 29 July 1659, there
is the following record:
Be it known unto all
that are present and to come that I, John Gosmer of Southampton upon
Long Island in America (Gentleman), have given and granted and by this
my present Deed have confirmed to my adopted sone John Woodruf whoe hath
lived with me from a child, All my goods and chattells, howses and lands
with all the appurtenances, thereunto belonging, and all privileges
pertaining thereunto; To have and to hold and to enjoy the above
mentioned gifts as his owne forever. Also Elizabeth the wife of ye said
John Gosmer (gent.) hath consented and confirmed all the above mentioned
gifts in witness whereof they have boath of them hereunto set to their
hands and seals this Day of July 29; in the year of ye nativity of our
Lord Christ one thousand six hundred fifty-nine.
His first appearance by
his own act in the town records was in June 1666, when he (then probably
about sixteen years of age) registered as his earmark (brand for cattle,
sheep, etc.) “a half-penny under the left ear.” The “one half-penny”
earmark had probably been used earlier by his older brother, but when he
emigrated to New Jersey, it was abandoned and he was free to use it. His
father’s earmark was “two half-pennys under the left ear.”
It was perhaps not
until 1670, or later, that he married HANNAH NEWTON.
Benoni Newton, in a
deed of 1682 described John Woodruff as his “brother”. As he had not
married either of John’s two sisters, “brother” doubtless meant
“brother-in-law”. Mr. Newton was a Town Trustee in 1693.
In 1675 he joined in
the town agreement to set apart a house and land to “Bee and remain from
time to time and forever to the use of ye ministry of our said towne, as
the providence of God shall, hereafter dispose ministers of the word
successively unto us.”
On 26 October 1682, he
again recorded an earmark, this time registering it for “his son John
Woodruff, Jun.,” which was to be “two half-pennys under the left ear
which earmark was his grandmother Woodruff’s and is by her made over to
the said John Woodruff, Jun.” This earmark she inherited upon the death
of her husband.
And again, on 8 January
1693/94 “John Woodruff records earmark yt was formerly recorded to his
son John Woodruff to Samuell Woodruff his son being two half pennys
under the left ear”. In his will, son Samuel is named as the “eldest
son”. So we know that his firstborn son John Jun. died before 8 Jan
1693/4.
He was included, for
purposes of taxation, in “The Estemate of the Town of Southampton for
the year 1683.” In 1694 he subscribed for the support of two of
schoolmaster Mr. Mowbrey’s “schollers”; and in 1696 he was among the
inhabitants of the town assessed for a contribution to the “defence of
the fronteer.” From 1674 until 1698 there are numerous items, besides
those already mentioned, regarding the division, dealing in, and
management of land.
LET’S TALK ABOUT LAND
By the Lynn agreement
of 1639, Southampton land was owned by the Proprietors as tenants in
common, until it was, from time to time, divided by the drawing of lots.
The shares were proportioned to the amount of money each had contributed
to the “undertaking.” To provide a convenient unit, the town, in 1648,
adopted one-fortieth of £6,000 – £150 – as the value of one “lot”, to be
subdivided into three “fifties.”
Shares passed by
inheritance, and could be purchased. The undivided land was called
“commonage.” As the divisions were made at different times in separate
localities, and as in each division each proprietor was entitled to his
share of homestead, meadow, upland, arable, and wood lands, their
holdings were necessarily widely dispersed, and there were naturally
very many exchanges between individuals to make their farms better
suited to their purposes. Hence it came about that the “swapping of
land” seems to have taken the place of the “swapping of horses”
elsewhere; and John Woodruff evidently did his share.
The Woodruffs of
New Jersey
provides a full list of the deeds in the endnote 69 on page 54.
His share ended when,
on 14 January 1701, he “in health of body” made his will, and on 1 April
1703, it was proved. Between the death of his father in 1670, and his
own death in 1703, Southampton had passed through many changes with ups
and downs along the way.
WHAT KIND OF UPS AND DOWNS?
In July 1673, New York
was captured by the Dutch, for one.
In a manly petition of
August 14th, the “Inhabitants of the East Riding of Long Island (namely,
Southampton, Easthampton, South Hoold, Seataukok, and Huntington)”
surrendered under duress. But, with some aid from Connecticut, and one
“spirited engagement,” they successfully resisted the taking of an oath
of allegiance until, on 10 November 1674, Gov. Andross replaced the
Dutch.
Instead of rewarding
the East Riding for its brave loyalty, the Governor promptly forced the
inhabitants to take out, and pay for, new patents for land that was
already indisputably their own. The later change of their lord’s title
from Duke of York to James II only increased the power to oppress, until
the revolution of 1686 brought relief.
No doubt John Woodruff
did his duty as a good citizen, but the records don’t show that he took
a prominent part in public affairs. Born with the silver spoon in the
mouth that deprives of one incentive to exertion, although soon
surpassed in wealth by many in the growing community, yet still the
possessor (as his will shows) of broad and scattered acres, now
unhappily subjected to grinding taxation and extortion, and with ten
children to bring up, he was perhaps one of those upon whom Gov.
Lovelace and his successors had laid such taxes as to “leave no time for
thinking of anything else than how to pay them”; and was what we would,
nowadays, call “land poor.” John Woodruff III’s Will
He bequeathed his
possessions to his wife, Hannah; to his
sons Samuel, Joseph,
Benjamin, Nathaniel, Isaac and Jonathan; and to daughters Sarah Davis,
Hannah, Abigail, and Elizabeth. When the will was drawn in 1701, all,
from Nathaniel down, were not yet twenty-one.
To the daughters, he
left £10 each on their coming of age, Sarah no doubt having had a
portion on her marriage, and the others to be similarly cared for by his
heirs.
To JOSEPH,
his second surviving son, he left £20 and a remote reversionary interest
in lands willed to the younger brothers. He had emigrated to New Jersey
in 1701, and had probably received a portion in money already.
To his wife and his
other sons, he bequeathed all his houses and lands, including commonage.
The home lot was on the
east side of Southampton’s Main Street, near the “Hampton Road” to
Bridgehampton, Easthampton, etc. Its “three acres” of 1648 had been
later extended eastward “as much as may be”.
To give an idea of what
type of land a man like this would own, following is a list of his
holdings and how they were situated:
- Adjoining a pond
called Scuttle Hole (about 1-1/2 miles NW from Bridge Hampton);
- by Long Pond, a
string of ponds extending southerly from the above to a point on the
“Hampton Road”, just W of Bridge Hampton; and
- Brushey Neck, a
part of Hog Neck, lying just W of Sag Harbor’s Main Street. There
was another “Brushey Neck” west of Westhampton.
- Lands also
adjoining the W side of the Town Pond (Lake Agawam, the Indian name
of Southampton), continuing westward, in Captain’s and Halsey’s
Necks of the Great Plain, and at Shinnecock;
- Land northward
also at Sebonnucke (Seponnucke, Sebonic, Sebonac), just N of the
golf grounds;
- The farm was in
the possession of Captain White in 1909.
- Land on the
Aqauebauge (or Accabog) meadows, going W past Canoe Place, along the
S shore of Great Peconic Bay, SE from Riverhead.
He had previously, by
exchange or sale, disposed of other lands at Quogue; at Catchaponak
(just W of Quogue meadows); at Sagaponack (Sagg, 2-3 miles SE of Bridge
Hampton); and of a part of his home lot. And more.
THE LAST ON LONG ISLAND
All the siblings except
Joseph, remained on Long Island. Samuel, as the oldest son in 1703,
inherited the Gosmer-Woodruff homestead. In subsequent years, it was
rebuilt and remodeled to some extent, and as thus altered, is shown in
volume one of the Southampton Town Records and in Mr. Howell’s History.
The house stood for many years, being the last on Long Island that
retained the old-fashioned rhomboidal window-panes once in general use,
and was for this reason known as the house of the diamond windows.
Samuel’s son, Junior, was on record in Southampton as dealing in land in
1733; but by 1738 he passed from view.
His brothers presumably
scattered to the farms that had been bequeathed to them near the town.
None of their graves or of their sisters has been found; however, there
are tombstones of their descendants in the Bridge Hampton, Scuttle Hole,
and Shelter Island burying-grounds, and perhaps elsewhere. The
descendants mentioned were living (apparently not very far apart) to the
eastward of Water Mill. Doubtless the tombstones still exist, but
possibly are hidden from view beneath the soil.
Formerly, many families
living outside the villages buried their dead on their own farms, or
with their neighbors in a nearby plot. If the land was kept in the
family, the graves might have been preserved; but in changed hands, it’s
anyone’s guess. Existing tombstones illustrate every stage of change
from upright positions until only scraps are still left bare by the ever
encroaching sod. At Scuttle Hole, for instance, in some cases, the
entire space is fast being covered by an undergrowth, and before many
years have passed even the memory that it was a burying-ground may be
obliterated from the minds of all but a few genealogists.
CHILDREN OF JOHN III & HANNAH (NEWTON) WOODRUFF
All born at Southampton, Suffolk Co, Long Island
- John Woodruff IV,
d. prior to 1703, the date of his father’s will.
- Samuel Woodruff;
mar. Hester (-); d. 1715.
As mentioned above, Samuel
inherited the home site in 1703. He and his wife, Hester, died
1715-1717, leaving a son Samuel, Jr., who inherited the place. On 12
April 1728, it was this son, Samuel Woodruff Jr., and Sarah, his wife,
who deeded the home site, that had been eighty years in the Gosmer and
Woodruff families, to Mr. Francis Pelletreu.
-
JOSEPH WOODRUFF
was born 1676; mar.
Hannah (-).
- Benjamin Woodruff;
mar. 12 Sep 1704, Margaret Davis; d. 1750 at Bridgehampton, Long
Island.
- Nathaniel Woodruff
Sr.; b. about 1680; mar. Abigail Leake (dtr. of Ebenezer Leake, of
Easthampton, Long Island); d. 1725.
- Isaac Woodruff; b.
after 1680.
- Jonathan Woodruff
[named in father’s will].
- Sarah Woodruff;
mar. Zachariah Davis; d. before 1716.
- Hannah Woodruff.
- Abigail Woodruff.
- Elizabeth
Woodruff.
Joseph Woodruff, married Hannah
A Joseph Woodruff
(1676-1742) lies buried at Westfield, New Jersey, whose existence in his
own right has not been recognized by modern historians. These have
merged the scanty records of his life in that of his Elizabeth Town
cousin Joseph (1674-1746), or sometimes in that cousin's son Joseph ;
but their error has been the more excusable because the cousins were
only two years apart in date of birth, and because not only they but
their fathers bore the same given names as well as surname.
The Etown father, John
Woodruff (1637-91), was the elder son of the Immigrant, John Woodruff
(1604-70), while the Westfield Joseph's father was the younger son and
brother, John Woodruff (1650-1703), of Southampton, Long Island ; from
which town our Joseph emigrated to New Jersey.
His Westfield tombstone tells us that he departed this life February the
2nd, Anno Domini 1741-2, in the 65th year of his age ; so he was born in
1676 or 1677. While living at Southampton, and some seventeen or
eighteen years old, he was quite possibly one of the two "schollers" for
whom in 1694 his father subscribed "att twelve shillings In cash per
scholler for the Terme of Six Months," they to be taught " In the hours
following viz, from Eight to Eleven a Clocke In the forenoone, and from
one to five of the clocke In ye afternoone"; but nothing is certainly
known excepting that he was included as the second son of John Woodruff
in the 1698 list of the inhabitants of Southampton, and that his
father's will, signed on the "14 day of January Anno Dom 1700 alias
1701", treated him as one who had already gone from home.
There were good reasons
why the second son should have sought a career elsewhere. His father
although a wealthy landowner was because of extortionate taxation
land-poor, and there were five brothers and four sisters to be provided
for : while there were influential relatives in New Jersey, where in
1699 there was to be a distribution of rich lands; and his cousin Robert
Woolley of Southampton was also to become an Etown Associate and draw a
Westfield lot. ^° So Joseph transferred the history of our line from
Long Island to New Jersey.
In Joseph's will the eldest son named (John) was not born until 1704,
but as the daughter Abigail (Gold) was among the five children already
provided for she may have been the first born, or in the beginning of
the settle- ment deaths may have left no record. Certainly, because in
1699 Joseph would have been some twenty-three years of age and his wife
Hannah perhaps sixteen, it would be expected that they came together to
New Jersey : and there was an abundant choice at Southampton of maidens
of her given name. Practically, however, nothing is known about the wife
and mother excepting that there were ten sons and three daughters to
mourn when but a few months after her comrade's death she followed to a
grave beside him.
Hannah ye Wife of Joseph Woodruff Died August the 11th
Anno Domini 1743
In ye 58th Year of her Age.
Their married life had been one long anxiety. Barely 95 In the 1698 List
(Howell p. 34) there were some 34 unmarried (Brides married) of the
variously spelled name of "Hannah" in a total number of 350 women.
PRIMARY REFERENCE
Francis E.
Woodruff. The Woodruffs of
New Jersey: Who Came from Fordwich, Kent, England, by way of Lynn,
Massachusetts, and Southampton, Long Island. New York: The Grafton
Press, 1909. This book is a revision and enlargement of the book, “A
Branch of the Woodruff Stock”.
Along with all the textual data are maps, including
Plate C: The Southampton Lands;
Plate E: The Division of the Eastern Section of the Town of Southampton;
and
Plate G: Washington Corner and Mendham.
SECONDARY
REFERENCES
Benjamin F.
Thompson. History of Long
Island: From Its Discovery and Settlement to the Present Time. 3rd
ed. New York, New York: R. H. Dodd, 1918.
SLC Family History Library Cat. No. 974.721 H2t.
Records of the Town of Southampton (printed 1874-96).
George R. Howell. The
Early History of Southampton, L. I.. 2nd ed., 1887.
Early Long Island Wills of Suffolk County: 1691-1703, with notes
by Wm. S. Pelletreau, 1897.
Royal R. Hinman. A
catalogue of the names of the early Puritan settlers of the colony of
Connecticut, etc. Hartford,
CT: Case, Tiffany and Company, 1852-1856. SLC Family History Library
Cat. No. 974.6 D2hra 1852-56 pt. 1-5.
James Savage. A
genealogical dictionary of the first settlers of New England.
Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1860-1862. 4 v. On 3 microfilm
rolls at SLC Family History Library: Film Nos. 1351-1352-1353.
Hatfield.
Clayton’s History of Union
County [New Jersey].
NOTE
Much work
was done on behalf of the Woodruff and all connected families, by a
friend of the family, name unknown to me. My 2nd cousin once removed,
Mildred McVea, had a sister named Mrs. Brooks ("Jinny") Chandler.
Jinny's dear friend living in New Jersey became fascinated with our New
Jersey families, and spent hundreds of hours researching, typing, and
writing up her research on all the connected families; e.g., Woodruff,
Coe, Fitz Randolph, and dozens more. All the materials that she sent to
Jinny were later sent by Jinny to me as I was by then the family
genealogist. All her data are now in my possession. I have not located
the research's name on any of the papers she produced. Her
correspondence with Jinny was in 1974. I got the materials in the 1983. |